GW has just published its Annual report for the Financial Year ending May 2015
Earnings per Share: 38 pence
Dividend per Share: 52 pence
Putting aside the fact that they are paying out more than they earned, GW has obviously decided that cash is better in the hands of investors rather than re-invested back in the company. That's an interesting insight into how they few their long term prospects.
So - do you advise I buy my shares now?
ReplyDeleteMichael Hill International only pay out about 6c per share.
Well GW shares have a fantastic dividend yield.....around 10% when interest rates are 1%
DeleteRevenue down 4% (119.1m from 123.25m in 2014), however... profit up 34% (16.5m from 12.3m). Seems odd as first but... costs down 6% (67.2m from 71.4m).
ReplyDeleteOnly so much cost cutting can be done before you need to lift in-comings to keep growth. It is more concerning when they are paying out dividends above eps and adding comments like this (referencing a specific IT project)
"As a result our capital investment is likely to be higher over the next few years. The total cost of this project, including internal resources, is estimated to be £6.4 million. "
As this ends May 2015 no impact of Age of Sigmar is yet showing. Which was released to "broad acclaim".
Finally... an interesting/ominous note for those still loving 40k as is.
"Secondly, I will review our product range. We believe this is long overdue: it is time for a resetting of the ranges. Not tweaking here and there but a top down reassessment"
Neil.... how did you get shares without buying them previously???
Buy having a good command of da Queen's Inglish lol
DeleteIt's lucky inflection and emphasis is so clear on da interwebz :)
DeleteIf we get enough shares do you think we can reverse Age of Sigmar... put it in the corner with Storm of Magic like a repressed memory?
Good plan. Let's buy the company and then run it proper.
DeleteJust one thing - could you lend me a few dollars so I can buy my share?
I'll lend you a few drachma... I hear they are coming back in fashion?
Delete